noUnsafeOptionalChaining
Ce contenu n’est pas encore disponible dans votre langue.
Summary
Section titled “Summary”- Rule available since:
v1.0.0 - Diagnostic Category:
lint/correctness/noUnsafeOptionalChaining - This rule is recommended, which means is enabled by default.
- This rule doesn’t have a fix.
- The default severity of this rule is error.
- Sources:
- Same as
no-unsafe-optional-chaining
- Same as
Description
Section titled “Description”Disallow the use of optional chaining in contexts where the undefined value is not allowed.
The optional chaining (?.) expression can short-circuit with a return value of undefined. Therefore, treating an evaluated optional chaining expression as a function, object, number, etc., can cause TypeError or unexpected results. Also, parentheses limit the scope of short-circuiting in chains.
Examples
Section titled “Examples”Invalid
Section titled “Invalid”1 in obj?.foo;code-block.js:1:9 lint/correctness/noUnsafeOptionalChaining ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
✖ Unsafe usage of optional chaining.
> 1 │ 1 in obj?.foo;
│ ^^
2 │
ℹ If it short-circuits with ‘undefined’ the evaluation will throw TypeError here:
> 1 │ 1 in obj?.foo;
│ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
2 │
with (obj?.foo);code-block.cjs:1:10 lint/correctness/noUnsafeOptionalChaining ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
✖ Unsafe usage of optional chaining.
> 1 │ with (obj?.foo);
│ ^^
2 │
ℹ If it short-circuits with ‘undefined’ the evaluation will throw TypeError here:
> 1 │ with (obj?.foo);
│ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
2 │
for (bar of obj?.foo);code-block.js:1:16 lint/correctness/noUnsafeOptionalChaining ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
✖ Unsafe usage of optional chaining.
> 1 │ for (bar of obj?.foo);
│ ^^
2 │
ℹ If it short-circuits with ‘undefined’ the evaluation will throw TypeError here:
> 1 │ for (bar of obj?.foo);
│ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
2 │
bar instanceof obj?.foo;code-block.js:1:19 lint/correctness/noUnsafeOptionalChaining ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
✖ Unsafe usage of optional chaining.
> 1 │ bar instanceof obj?.foo;
│ ^^
2 │
ℹ If it short-circuits with ‘undefined’ the evaluation will throw TypeError here:
> 1 │ bar instanceof obj?.foo;
│ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
2 │
const { bar } = obj?.foo;code-block.js:1:20 lint/correctness/noUnsafeOptionalChaining ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
✖ Unsafe usage of optional chaining.
> 1 │ const { bar } = obj?.foo;
│ ^^
2 │
ℹ If it short-circuits with ‘undefined’ the evaluation will throw TypeError here:
> 1 │ const { bar } = obj?.foo;
│ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
2 │
(obj?.foo)();code-block.js:1:5 lint/correctness/noUnsafeOptionalChaining ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
✖ Unsafe usage of optional chaining.
> 1 │ (obj?.foo)();
│ ^^
2 │
ℹ If it short-circuits with ‘undefined’ the evaluation will throw TypeError here:
> 1 │ (obj?.foo)();
│ ^^
2 │
(baz?.bar).foo;code-block.js:1:5 lint/correctness/noUnsafeOptionalChaining ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
✖ Unsafe usage of optional chaining.
> 1 │ (baz?.bar).foo;
│ ^^
2 │
ℹ If it short-circuits with ‘undefined’ the evaluation will throw TypeError here:
> 1 │ (baz?.bar).foo;
│ ^^^
2 │
(obj?.foo)?.();obj?.foo();(obj?.foo ?? bar)();obj?.foo.bar;obj.foo?.bar;foo?.()?.bar;How to configure
Section titled “How to configure”{ "linter": { "rules": { "correctness": { "noUnsafeOptionalChaining": "error" } } }}